Ulf Kirchdorfer would like to get some discussion going about awards and medals with this post. . .
It is time to do away with age category medals at road races. Whether it’s a local 5K or a marathon of 25,000 runners, America is drowning in baubles of varying unoriginality with ribbons that are running out of colors to separate one event from another.
It is bad enough that we accumulate enough t-shirts or sweat-wicking singlets so that many runners would not have to do laundry for a month if dressing casually. Another stupid Santa or running shoe in miniature showing poor craftsmanship does not need to saddle our junked up planet or threaten to injure someone’s dog as the medal falls off a hook or rack people use to display their insignificant little victories.
Lest I be accused of being Scrooge, let me remind you that I am certain part of our economic trade deficit could be helped by discontinuing offering all this merchandise made in China to runners who sign up for a road race. Whatever happened to running a good race and celebrating the victor, and maybe second and third place for good measure? Do we really need to hand out bought self-esteem pieces? Are runners’ motivational powers so weak that extrinsic junk must be part of the package?
A friend tells me that I am being a purist by making this proposal, but he hopes that these medals will help his nine-year-old son develop the habit of running. A nine-year-old can only develop a lifelong habit of running by being handed a token? Is this not like the current educational practice of announcing everyone a winner in the schools, even if all students really are losers. And are all students not losers if awards are so freely given, the same applying to runners?
Do middle-aged people really need to look forward to turning 50 so that they can migrate to the 50-54 age category to have an edge for a year or two, having “suffered” as 49-year-olds in the 44-49 age category?
If we follow this logic of medal giveaways, I can see a time soon when extra ribbons will be attached to the spoils of unexceptional victory because the wind blew an extra mile faster than zero wind speed. Or if it rains, let’s add another ribbon. Someone takes a wrong turn because he or she is not paying attention, one more ribbon.
No, let us have a committee of road racing determine an elaborate classification system that uses color codes to delineate wind speed, humidity, temperature, road surface, spectator noise or absence, travel time to the event, hours spent at work-work before the race. After all, we must reward all the obstacles homo sapiens spoilus has to overcome to match the meter of “special” so many runners think they deserve.
Is this obsession with medals for everyone in every age category and wishes to be rewarded the slightest for going only an extra inch symptomatic of the kind of society in which we live? Would a hundred years ago the demands been less by road runners?
While we have the advantage of hindsight and can answer this question, it is worrisome what kind of mediocrity or sense of athletic prowess a medals-for-all mindset and practice contributes to the world of running.
Along similar mile markers, why is it that everyone who finishes a marathon gets a medal? Would business suffer so if people paid a lesser or even same entry fee and lined up and were timed “only”? If even more of the entry fees were donated to charities?
How selfish and mediocre do we really want to be as runners and would not changing the awards system structure be a good first step in changing the sport, even the recreational part of the sport, into something better?
Or is everyone and no one toeing the line on this one?


Reply With Quote
